This site is currently being transferred to a new system,
and will be relaunched at the beginning of 2009.

Chain 52

From Chains of Reason

Jump to: navigation, search

The Ontological Argument is unsound.

Preliminary reading

Chain 50: A god must exist, by definition. [the Ontological Argument]

Link 1

Premise 1
An implication of the Ontological Argument is that the greatest imaginable example of any particular category of things must exist, by definition.
Premise 2
Putting aside the category of beings, the greatest imaginable example of any particular category of things - from unicorns to chairs - never exists in reality.
  • see also:
  • Chain 53: The greatest imaginable example of any particular category of things could still exist even if it does not exist in the universe.
Conclusion
The Ontological Argument is unsound.
  • see also:


External links


Personal tools